<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dissemination of Innovation and Patent Life</title>
	<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/1309</link>
	<description>News and commentary about antitrust, economics, technology, policy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Hanno Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/1309#comment-13772</link>
		<author>Hanno Kaiser</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/1309#comment-13772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That's a very valid point, Geoff, particularly with respect to digital goods in a pure sales model, where rights holders and potential infringers have the same access to the means of distribution. But keep in mind that the pure sales model (i.e., I get an exclusive copy and pay $ for it) is increasingly only one of many revenue streams fueled by increased distribution. For service, support, upgrade, and otherwise "performance"-related revenues, it doesn't matter whether distribution is "authorized" or not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very valid point, Geoff, particularly with respect to digital goods in a pure sales model, where rights holders and potential infringers have the same access to the means of distribution. But keep in mind that the pure sales model (i.e., I get an exclusive copy and pay $ for it) is increasingly only one of many revenue streams fueled by increased distribution. For service, support, upgrade, and otherwise &#8220;performance&#8221;-related revenues, it doesn&#8217;t matter whether distribution is &#8220;authorized&#8221; or not.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/1309#comment-13768</link>
		<author>geoff</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/1309#comment-13768</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome back, Hanno!  An important caveat to what you say (other, of course, than the potential unreliability of the statistics): Chances are that more rapid dissemination is also correlated with easier, more rapid and more effective infringement/copying.  Your conclusion that more rapid dissemination supports weakened IPRs may not hold--it would depend which effect predominates.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back, Hanno!  An important caveat to what you say (other, of course, than the potential unreliability of the statistics): Chances are that more rapid dissemination is also correlated with easier, more rapid and more effective infringement/copying.  Your conclusion that more rapid dissemination supports weakened IPRs may not hold&#8211;it would depend which effect predominates.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
