<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FTC and &#8220;the United States&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/406</link>
	<description>News and commentary about antitrust, economics, technology, policy</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Antitrust Review &#187; The FTC and the &#8220;United States&#8221; Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/406#comment-1121</link>
		<author>Antitrust Review &#187; The FTC and the &#8220;United States&#8221; Part II</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 15:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/406#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] In March, Dan wrote about the Supreme Court&#8217;s request to the Solicitor General to file a brief regarding the petition for cert in FTC v. Schering-Plough. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In March, Dan wrote about the Supreme Court&#8217;s request to the Solicitor General to file a brief regarding the petition for cert in FTC v. Schering-Plough. [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
