A Random Monday Walk

Note: this post’s title, and this one’s too, are not random.

3 Responses to “A Random Monday Walk”

  1. david giacalone Says:

    Hey, where were you guys when f/k/a talked about Sports Law Blog [it’s not called a “Blawg”, thank goodness] in baseball: intestate commerce (stare decisis on steroids?) (Dec. 8, 2004) and antitrusters question NCAA purchase of NIT (Sept. 13, 2005)?

    Talk about new guys on the block.

  2. David Fischer Says:

    Where were we? Just a dream in the back of Hanno’s mind (which may or may not be a place one wants to spend time).

  3. Antitrust Review » Intel-AMD Says:

    […] As I mentioned earlier this week, Intel filed a motion to dismiss AMD’s complaint.  According to MarketWatch, “claims AMD cannot apply U.S. antitrust laws to alleged harms that supposedly occurred overseas. ‘To a large extend, AMD seeks recovery under U.S. antitrust law for lost sales of its foreign-made processors to foreign companies in foreign locations,’ Intel’s attorneys wrote in court papers. AMD, Intel’s attorneys argue, makes its personal computer chips at a factory in Germany and sells more than 70% of them to customers outside the United States.” News.com also has a brief story. Technorati Tags: antitrust, Intel, AMD You can also bookmark this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos […]

Leave a Reply


Bad Behavior has blocked 1119 access attempts in the last 7 days.