<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Aching Hip, Part II</title>
	<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/606</link>
	<description>News and commentary about antitrust, economics, technology, policy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Antitrust Review &#187; More on the Orthopedics Investigations</title>
		<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/606#comment-3301</link>
		<author>Antitrust Review &#187; More on the Orthopedics Investigations</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/606#comment-3301</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] EasyBourse has an interesting piece on the events giving rise the current DoJ probe into the orthopedics market. Looks like an invitation to collude case to me: According to Zimmer [Holdings, Inc. - ZMH], which released second-quarter results after the closing bell Wednesday, a string of events appears to have touched off the probe. In the fall of 2005, a representative at a hospital sent an email to orthopedics companies with a bid proposal regarding orthopedic implant pricing, Zimmer said in its earnings release, which also detailed the antitrust investigation. &#8220;Upon receipt of that email, a representative of one of Zimmer&#8217;s competitors sent an unsolicited message to the same group of competitors that received the hospital&#8217;s original message,&#8221; Zimmer said. &#8220;The competitor&#8217;s email proposed that the orthopaedic companies adopt a uniform pricing strategy in responding to this hospital.&#8221; Zimmer did not name the competitor company in question. Zimmer and its local independent distributor rejected this proposal, stating &#8220;emphatically&#8221; in writing that neither Zimmer nor the distributor would participate in the pricing discussions with competitors, Zimmer said.      You can also bookmark this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] EasyBourse has an interesting piece on the events giving rise the current DoJ probe into the orthopedics market. Looks like an invitation to collude case to me: According to Zimmer [Holdings, Inc. - ZMH], which released second-quarter results after the closing bell Wednesday, a string of events appears to have touched off the probe. In the fall of 2005, a representative at a hospital sent an email to orthopedics companies with a bid proposal regarding orthopedic implant pricing, Zimmer said in its earnings release, which also detailed the antitrust investigation. &#8220;Upon receipt of that email, a representative of one of Zimmer&#8217;s competitors sent an unsolicited message to the same group of competitors that received the hospital&#8217;s original message,&#8221; Zimmer said. &#8220;The competitor&#8217;s email proposed that the orthopaedic companies adopt a uniform pricing strategy in responding to this hospital.&#8221; Zimmer did not name the competitor company in question. Zimmer and its local independent distributor rejected this proposal, stating &#8220;emphatically&#8221; in writing that neither Zimmer nor the distributor would participate in the pricing discussions with competitors, Zimmer said.      You can also bookmark this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
