<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Authorities &#8220;Approve&#8221; Deals?</title>
	<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/629</link>
	<description>News and commentary about antitrust, economics, technology, policy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Manfred Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/629#comment-3435</link>
		<author>Manfred Gabriel</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/629#comment-3435</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are two issues at work here: First, I think FTC/DoJ should get one shot at Sec. 7 review, and after a merger has been cleared (and I feel that mergers schould be affirmatively cleared by the agencies), the parties should be able to rely the decision, unless they "fooled with the HSR filing requirements" and obtained clearance fraudulently. After clearance and closing, the agencies can review under Sections 1 or 2 (and FTC Act 5).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The second issue is the $11k/d fines, and they apply only under HSR, of course. The issue here is that HSR filing requirements are vague, especially item 4(c). Also, there is no written intent requirement. If a person diligently searches but misses a 4(c), it is still subject to fines from the date of the filing obligation if that 4(c) document shows up two years later, for example, as part of a Second Request on an follow-on transaction. The agencies do not have to show intent. Section 7A(g)(1) mentions only the "failure to comply," and contains no subjective element. (I realize, of course, that in practice agencies impose fine in egregious cases---but I would like to see the statute or at least rules explicitly limit fines to cases that deserve fines.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two issues at work here: First, I think FTC/DoJ should get one shot at Sec. 7 review, and after a merger has been cleared (and I feel that mergers schould be affirmatively cleared by the agencies), the parties should be able to rely the decision, unless they &#8220;fooled with the HSR filing requirements&#8221; and obtained clearance fraudulently. After clearance and closing, the agencies can review under Sections 1 or 2 (and FTC Act 5).</p>

<p>The second issue is the $11k/d fines, and they apply only under HSR, of course. The issue here is that HSR filing requirements are vague, especially item 4(c). Also, there is no written intent requirement. If a person diligently searches but misses a 4(c), it is still subject to fines from the date of the filing obligation if that 4(c) document shows up two years later, for example, as part of a Second Request on an follow-on transaction. The agencies do not have to show intent. Section 7A(g)(1) mentions only the &#8220;failure to comply,&#8221; and contains no subjective element. (I realize, of course, that in practice agencies impose fine in egregious cases&#8212;but I would like to see the statute or at least rules explicitly limit fines to cases that deserve fines.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sutton Keany</title>
		<link>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/629#comment-3433</link>
		<author>Sutton Keany</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/629#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whoa!  The process in the U.S. is that you may have to deal with the HSR issues and $11K+ a day IF you have fooled with the HSR filing requirements (and the filing of 4(c) doc, etc).  That does NOT mean that you have to face the $11k/day if either agency determines that the transaction merits post-closing review.
S.K.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa!  The process in the U.S. is that you may have to deal with the HSR issues and $11K+ a day IF you have fooled with the HSR filing requirements (and the filing of 4(c) doc, etc).  That does NOT mean that you have to face the $11k/day if either agency determines that the transaction merits post-closing review.
S.K.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
