http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/820 News and commentary about antitrust, economics, technology, policy Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:49:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/820#comment-8959 David Fischer Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:27:32 +0000 http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/820#comment-8959 <p>I have. Ping Inc.’s brief describes its recently adopted vertical minimum resale advertising and pricing policy (its “iFIT Pricing Policy”) and the “extraordinary lengths” it went through in order to achieve a minimum resale price that complies with Colgate and avoids Dr. Miles’s per se rule.</p> I have. Ping Inc.’s brief describes its recently adopted vertical minimum resale advertising and pricing policy (its “iFIT Pricing Policy”) and the “extraordinary lengths” it went through in order to achieve a minimum resale price that complies with Colgate and avoids Dr. Miles’s per se rule.

]]> http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/820#comment-8958 Jerry Kohl Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:05:05 +0000 http://www.antitrustreview.com/archives/820#comment-8958 <p>Have you read Ping Golf's brief. I think it is the best and simplest to understand.</p> Have you read Ping Golf’s brief. I think it is the best and simplest to understand.

]]>